<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Geoengineering With Space Mirrors Will Have Negative Effects</title> <atom:link href="/2012/06/19/geoengineering-with-space-mirrors-will-have-negative-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://revmodo.com/2012/06/19/geoengineering-with-space-mirrors-will-have-negative-effects/</link> <description>Covering the clean energy industry</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 07:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Stephen</title><link>http://revmodo.com/2012/06/19/geoengineering-with-space-mirrors-will-have-negative-effects/#comment-144</link> <dc:creator>David Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://revmodo.com/?p=3049#comment-144</guid> <description>&quot;but there’s a lot we can do today that we are avoiding doing because we believe technology will save us&quot; you think that confidence in technology (or geoengineering) is the reason for ignoring global efforts to mitigate GHG emissions? that&#039;s somewhat incorrect. There are several issues around this including economic recession, &#039;pressing priorities&#039; and what can be called &#039;song and dance&#039; by certain emerging economies about their role to cut from their top polluting status. Geoengineering has diverse issues, known of to certain extents and postulated. Studies like this confirm past ones and add up. Geoengineering may never be deployed on a large scale, but discretion says we should prepare it like we will.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but there’s a lot we can do today that we are avoiding doing because we believe technology will save us&#8221; you think that confidence in technology (or geoengineering) is the reason for ignoring global efforts to mitigate GHG emissions? that&#8217;s somewhat incorrect. There are several issues around this including economic recession, &#8216;pressing priorities&#8217; and what can be called &#8216;song and dance&#8217; by certain emerging economies about their role to cut from their top polluting status. Geoengineering has diverse issues, known of to certain extents and postulated. Studies like this confirm past ones and add up. Geoengineering may never be deployed on a large scale, but discretion says we should prepare it like we will.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 4/9 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 306/311 objects using disk: basic

Served from: revmodo.com @ 2012-11-05 12:02:55 -->